= - Even position: White and Black have more or less equal chances. indicate good moves—especially ones which are surprising or involve particular skill. These symbols indicate the strategic balance of the game position: 1. Question marks and exclamation points that denote a move as bad or good are ubiquitous in chess literature. 5.Nc3! to indicate a move which is objectively sound, but was in his opinion a poor psychological choice, while Robert Hübner (see below) used it to indicate a move which is inaccurate and makes the player's task more difficult. The symbols normally used are "?? There are no exclamation marks, as they serve no useful purpose. Significado exclamation mark, dicionário de definições em inglês, consulte também 'exclamational',excavation',exclamatory', sinônimos +− (−+) - Decisive advantage: White (Black) has a winning advantage. Different books have slightly varying definitions. for particularly unusual or controversial moves, but these have no generally accepted meaning, and are typically used for humorous or entertainment purposes. A "?? The double exclamation point ("‼") is used to praise a move which the annotator thinks really shows the player's skill. ∞ - Unclear: It is unclear who (if anyone) has an advantage. Clear advantage: Black has much better chances. Nf6! +/= (=/+) - Slight advantage: White (Black) has slightly better chances. denotes a very good move while a single question mark (?) When annotating chess games, commentators frequently use widely recognized annotation symbols. Move evaluation symbols, by increasing effectiveness of the move: The double question mark "??" There are no exclamation marks, as they serve no useful purpose. The general consensus among chess writers is that these symbols are unnecessary. At times an annotation symbol may be put in parentheses, e.g. ", "! A double exclamation mark (!!) or Kh1! ", "??!") When the solution to a certain chess problem is given, there are also some conventions that have become a common practice: These symbols indicate the strategic balance of the game position: There are other symbols used by various chess engines and publications, such as Chess Informant and Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings. Some publications intended for an international audience, such as the Chess Informant, have a wide range of additional symbols that transcend language barriers. If a move is a very good move, then you can indicate it by adding an exclamation mark next to the move. These often lead to loss of tempo or material. 4. In the following diagram I made the first move pawn to e4. Question marks and exclamation points that denote a move as bad or good are ubiquitous in chess literature. A move that overlooks a forthcoming brilliant combination from the opponent would rarely receive more than one question mark, for example. Different writers have used these in different ways; for example Simon Webb used "(?)" Question marks and exclamation points that denote a move as bad or good are ubiquitous in chess literature. In 1959, Euwe and Hooper made the same use of the question mark, "... a decisive error...". ↑ - Initiative: Indicates an advantage in, ↑↑ - Development: Indicates a lead in development. Re7? Can also denote a position that is unclear, but appears to the annotator to be approximately equal. c5! they are merely obeying cultural norms, not laughing at their own jokes. The "!?" The Nunn convention cannot be used to annotate full games because the exact evaluation of a position is generally impractical to compute. this mark used for any other purpose, as to draw attention to an obvious mistake, in road warning signs, (in chess commentaries) beside the notation of a move considered a good one, (in mathematics) as a symbol of the factorial function, or (in logic) occurring with an existential quantifier. Castling kingside is written as “0-0”. "!!? Once the players start making good choices when faced with difficult decisions, however, a few moves may receive exclamation points from annotators. Some publications intended for an international audience, such as the Chess Informant, have a wide range of additional symbols that transcend language barriers. There are some systems which use these symbols in different ways. 2. (good), ⁉ (interesting), ⁈ (dubious), ? For example, in Rotlewi-Rubinstein 1907, Hans Kmoch awarded Rubinstein's 22...Rxc3 three exclamation points. Unclear position: It is unclear who (if anyone) has an advantage. ), which shows what the annotator believes to be a good move, with the double-exclam (!!) The common symbols for evaluating the merits of a move are "?? (mistake), ⁇ (blunder), Learn how and when to remove this template message, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chess_annotation_symbols&oldid=1001294667, Articles needing additional references from April 2014, All articles needing additional references, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, Refutation to a try move is marked with "! Among the definitions are "interesting, but perhaps not the best move", "move deserving attention", "enterprising move" and "risky move". "!!? The double exclamation point ("‼") is used to praise a move which the annotator thinks really shows the player's skill. indicates a blunder. They occur at all levels of play to all human competitors, but only the most basic computer programs commit such obvious mistakes. Annotators' use of punctuation may also be influenced by the result of the game regardless of the actual quality of the move; this tendency is sometimes referred to as "annotation by result". This is often used when a position is highly asymmetrical, such as Black having a ruined pawn structure but dangerous active piece-play. [3] Chess composition is used for very strong moves such as sound sacrifices of large amounts of material and counter-intuitive moves that prove very powerful. is one of the more controversial symbols. A move that overlooks a forthcoming brilliant combination from the opponent would rarely receive more than one question mark, for example. would show that I believed the Modern Defense deserving of praise. For instance, if a beginner makes a serious strategic error (for instance, accepting gratuitous pawn weaknesses or exchanging into a lost endgame) or overlooks a tactical sequence, this might be explained by the beginner's lack of skill, and be given only one question mark. Each piece has its own letter abbreviation, except the pawn. is a rarely used symbol denoting truly brilliant chess moves (ala. Bobby Fischer) while a double question mark (??) In his 1992 book Secrets of Rook Endings and other books in the series (Secrets of Minor-Piece Endings and Secrets of Pawnless Endings), John Nunn uses these symbols in a more specific way in the context of endgames where the optimal line of play can be determined with certainty: This convention has been used in some later works, such as Fundamental Chess Endings and Secrets of Pawn Endings by Karsten Müller and Frank Lamprecht, but it can be safely assumed the convention is not being used unless there is a specific note otherwise. Question marks and exclamation points that denote a move as bad or good are ubiquitous in chess literature. The nature of the mistake may be more strategic than tactical; in some cases, the move receiving a question mark may be one for which it is difficult to find a refutation. When annotating chess games, commentators frequently use widely recognized annotation symbols. Typical moves receiving a "!?" Re7? Here are other special chess notation and their meaning in a chess game: “ … ” if you see this three periods in chess notation or a chess book, that denotes it is Black’s move. Andrew Soltis jokingly called "!?" Some publications intended for an international audience, such as the Chess Informant have a wide range of additional symbols that transcend language barriers. There are some systems which use these symbols in different ways. Often used when a position is highly asymmetrical, e.g. Black has a ruined pawn structure but dangerous active piece-play. - a move which negatively affects the evaluation of the position: if the position had been drawn before the move, it is now lost; if won before the move, it is now drawn or lost, !? for particularly unusual or controversial moves, but these have no generally accepted meaning, and are typically used for humorous or entertainment purposes. for an exceptionally brilliant move. = - Even position: White and Black have more or less equal chances. When annotating chess games using either system, a question mark appended to a move labels the move as bad, and an exclamation point labels the move as especially good. Occasionally an annotation symbol may be put in parentheses, e.g. These often lead to loss of tempo or material. (below) but usually indicates that the annotator believes the move to be objectively bad, albeit hard to refute. "-worthy move often moves a player from a winning position to a draw or loss, a drawn position into a losing one, or an eventual losing position into an immediate loss. A single question mark "?" Find link is a tool written by Edward Betts.. searching for Chess notation 32 found (193 total) alternate case: chess notation Alphanumeric grid (179 words) exact match in snippet view article find links to article bottom, then follow the two lines until they meet in a spot. - a move which makes the opponent's task harder or one's own task easier; for example, in a theoretically lost position, a move which forces the opponent to find several "!" Punctuation (chess) When annotating chess games, commentators frequently use question marks and exclamation points to denote a move as bad or good. Typical moves receiving a "!?" Chess annotation symbols When annotating chess games, commentators frequently use widely recognized annotation symbols. "-worthy move usually results in an immediately lost position. Spassky won the game, and several annotators gave the move two exclamation points. A few writers have used three or more exclamation points ("!!!") ", "! A few writers have used unusual combinations of question marks and exclamation points (e.g. ", and "!!". Andrew Soltis jokingly called "!?" ", "!? The exclamation mark, !, also sometimes referred to as the exclamation point, especially in American English (another term is ecphoneme, now obsolete) is a punctuation mark usually used after an interjection or exclamation to indicate strong feelings or high volume (shouting), or to show emphasis. The Nunn convention cannot be used to annotate full games because the exact evaluation of a position is generally impractical to compute. While question marks indicate bad moves, exclamation points ("!") ", "?!? In this position, if … Typical moves which receive double question marks are those that overlook that the queen is under attack or overlook a checkmate. ", "? The nature of the mistake may be more strategic than tactical; in some cases, the move receiving a question mark may be one that is difficult to find a refutation for. These include: 2008-2016 © Policy :: Contact us max@gambiter.com, used to praise a move which the annotator thinks really shows the player's skill, ! The general consensus among chess writers is that these symbols are unnecessary. ", and "!!". If no piece is named, it’s assumed to a pawn move, and Knight is “N” not “K”, which is King. A few writers have used unusual combinations of question marks and exclamation points (e.g. Castling queenside is notated with “0-0-0”. In 1959, Euwe and Hooper made the same use of the question mark, "... a decisive error...". This is often used when a position is highly asymmetrical, such as Black having a ruined pawn structure but dangerous active piece-play. ¡Casi la matas!, 'Are you crazy?You almost killed her!' or Kh1! after a move indicates that the annotator thinks that the move is a poor one that should not be played. Brands (parent of fast food chains like Slight advantage: Black has slightly better chances. A sacrifice leading to a dangerous attack which the opponent should be able to defend against if they play well may receive a "?!". These may include sound sacrifices of large amounts of material and counter-intuitive moves that are in fact very strong. The symbol may also be interpreted as "best move". With compensation: Whoever is down in material has compensation for it. )", "(!)". In these cases, the corresponding symbol is juxtaposed in the text immediately after the move (e.g. The double exclamation point ("!!") moves in order to win, ?! The best move should be mentioned in the analysis in any case; an exclamation mark can only serve to indicate the personal excitement of the commentator." No matter. Typical moves which receive double question marks are those that overlook a tactic that wins substantial material or overlook a checkmate. The "?!" The exclamation mark often marks the end of a sentence, for example: "Watch out!" indicate good moves - especially ones which are surprising or involve particular skill. When the opponent’s king is threatened by check, a “+” sign is added to the end of the notation. In his 1992 book Secrets of Rook Endings and other books in the series (Secrets of Minor-Piece Endings and Secrets of Pawnless Endings), John Nunn uses these symbols in a more specific way in the context of endgames where the optimal line of play can be determined with certainty: This convention has been used in some later works, such as Fundamental Chess Endings and Secrets of Pawn Endings by Karsten Müller and Frank Lamprecht, but it can be safely assumed the convention is not being used unless there is a specific note otherwise. the symbol of the lazy annotator who finds a move interesting but cannot be bothered to work out whether it is good or bad.[2]. When annotating chess games, commentators frequently use widely recognized annotation symbols. Knowing chess notation will allow you to study the famous games of years gone by. is also often used instead of a "?" Chess annotation symbols. In these cases, the corresponding symbol is juxtaposed in the text immediately after the move (e.g. For example, take a look at this position between two strong players. A few writers have used unusual combinations of question marks and exclamation points (e.g. Likewise, an exceptionally bad blunder may be awarded three or more question marks ("???"). Hence annotators are usually somewhat conservative with the use of this symbol; for example, they would not annotate a game thus: 1.e4! indicates a blunder, a bad mistake. 5. A few writers have used three or more exclamation points ("!!!") Re7? Moreover, an annotator's use of symbols is often influenced by the player's strength: a positional misjudgment that an annotator might give a "??" exclamation mark synonyms, exclamation mark pronunciation, ... (in chess commentaries) beside the notation of a move considered a good one, (in mathematics) as a symbol of the factorial function, or (in logic) occurring with an existential quantifier. 2.Nf3! A single question mark "?" A question mark followed by an exclamation mark (? Chess punctuation: lt;p|>When annotating |chess| games, commentators frequently use widely recognized annotation sym... World Heritage Encyclopedia, the aggregation of the largest online encyclopedias available, and the most definitive collection ever assembled. ", "!? Moreover, an annotator's use of symbols is often influenced by the player's strength: a positional misjudgment that an annotator might give a "??" Although these may be good moves, the players have demonstrated little skill by simply following well-known opening theory in a main line Sicilian Defence. Example: “Watch out!” The character is encoded in Unicode as Template:Unichar. For instance, if a beginner makes a serious strategic error (for instance, accepting gratuitous pawn weaknesses or exchanging into a lost endgame) or overlooks a tactical sequence, this might be explained by the beginner's lack of skill and be given only one question mark. An exclamation point in chess notation refers to a strong move. When annotating chess games, commentators frequently use widely recognized annotation symbols. [5] Many of the symbols now have Unicode encodings, but quite a few still require a special chess font with appropriated characters. for particularly unusual or controversial moves, but these have no generally accepted meaning, and are typically used for humorous or entertainment purposes. Such moves are usually hard to find. Usually it indicates that the move leads to exciting or wild play and that the move is probably good. ?, see algebraic chess notation ). "(? Occasionally, the sign is used for a move which transforms a won position into a draw, perhaps because the annotator feels that the mistake is unworthy of the player's skill level. The best move should be mentioned in the analysis in any case; an exclamation mark can only serve to indicate the personal excitement of the commentator.". It isn't actually. The "?!" ", "?! are those involving speculative sacrifices or dangerous attacks which might turn out to be strategically deficient. In what is known as the Game of the Century, 13-year-old Bobby Fischer's decision to sacrifice his queen is usually awarded a double exclamation point. Alternatively, this may denote a move that is objectively bad, but sets up an attractive trap. If a master were to make the same move, some annotators might use the double question mark to indicate that one would never expect a player of the master's strength to make such a weak move. - a particularly difficult-to-find "!" Edmar Mednis asserted that if Spassky had lost the game, the move would likely have been given two question marks instead. It is also written as ±; the other similar symbols can be written in this style as well. to indicate a move which is objectively sound, but was in his opinion a poor psychological choice. Look it up now! Annotators are usually somewhat conservative with the use of this symbol. Question marks and exclamation points that denote a move as bad or good are ubiquitous in chess literature. This symbol is similar to the "!?" Usually it indicates that the move leads to exciting or wild play but that the objective evaluation of the move is unclear. This symbol is similar to the "!?" Castling is indicated by the special notation O-O for king-side castling and O-O-O for queen-side castling. [1] Some publications intended for an international audience, such as the Chess Informant, have a wide range of additional symbols that transcend language barriers. Move symbols in increasing effectiveness of the move: The double question mark "??" Alternatively, this may denote a move that is truly bad, but sets up an attractive trap. It is also written as ∓; the other similar symbols can be written in this style as well. No matter. There are no exclamation marks, as they serve no useful purpose. ", When dual avoidance is a part of the thematic content of a problem, avoided duals (if listed) are marked with "?". if played by a strong grandmaster might pass unremarked if played by a beginner. "An exclamation mark is like laughing at your own jokes." The general consensus among chess writers is that these symbols are unnecessary. (below) but usually indicates that the annotator believes the move to be objectively bad, albeit hard to refute. Chess notation is a convenient way to keep track of games, so that you can replay them to study tactics, understand mistakes, or impress your friends. Question marks and exclamation points that denote a move as bad or good are ubiquitous in chess literature. ", "? Elmore Leonard wrote of exclamation marks: "You are allowed no … )", "(!)". Decisive advantage: Black has a winning advantage. Likewise, an exceptionally bad blunder may be awarded three or more question marks ("???"). It is also written as ± for White advantage, ∓ for Black advantage; the other similar symbols can be written in this style as well. When annotating chess games, commentators frequently use widely recognized annotation symbols. ", This page was last edited on 19 January 2021, at 02:06. The common symbols for evaluating the merits of a move are "?? "(? For example in Rotlewi-Rubinstein 1907, Hans Kmoch awarded Rubinstein's 22...Rxc3 three exclamation points. ", "?! if played by a strong grandmaster might pass unremarked if played by a beginner. Significado exclamation, dicionário de definições em inglês, consulte também 'exclamation mark',exclamational',exclamation mark',excavation', sinônimos is one of the more controversial symbols. - the only move which maintains the current evaluation of the position: if the position is theoretically, !! are those involving speculative sacrifices or dangerous attacks which might turn out to be strategically deficient. Reasons for awarding the symbol vary widely between annotators; among them are strong opening novelties, well-timed breakthroughs, sound sacrifices, moves that set traps in lost positions, moves that avoid such traps, and good psychological choices in the opening. A sacrifice leading to a dangerous attack which the opponent should be able to defend against if he plays well may receive a "?!". move, ? ?, see algebraic chess notation). d6! Different books have slightly varying definitions. ", "? These may include sound sacrifices of large amounts of material and moves that at first glance seem very counter-intuitive. Define exclamation mark. The corresponding symbol is juxtaposed in the text immediately after the move (e.g. after a move indicates that the annotator thinks that the move is a poor one that should not be played. Chess Notation describes each move with the name of the pieces and the square to which it is moved. Nor is chess notation, which teems with exclamation marks, especially funny. ", "?!? indicates a gross blunder. Question marks and exclamation points that denote a move as bad or good are ubiquitous in chess literature. The "!?" They occur at all levels of play to all human competitors. There are other symbols used by various chess engines and publications, such as Chess Informant and Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings, when annotating moves or describing positions. =/∞ - With compensation: Whoever is down in material has compensation for the material. Whether a single or double question mark is used is subjective and may depend on the player's strength. Notation indicating how good a move is: ‼ (brilliant), ! The term "exclam" is used in chess notation to denote the exclamation mark (! Exclamation mark definition at Dictionary.com, a free online dictionary with pronunciation, synonyms and translation. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search When annotating chess games, commentators frequently use widely recognized annotation symbols. ?, see algebraic chess notation). The non noun. ", "?!? or Kh1! "!!? indicates a blunder, a very bad mistake. cxd4! +/− (−/+) - Advantage: White (Black) has much better chances. Among the definitions are "interesting, but perhaps not the best move", "move deserving attention", "enterprising move" and "risky move". ", and "!!". In Spanish, a sentence or clause ending in an exclamation mark must also begin with an inverted exclamation mark (the same also applies to the question mark): ¿Estás loco? “!” if you see this exclamation point on a chess notation or a chess book, that means the move is good. There are a few more special signs used in chess notation. The best move should be mentioned in the analysis in any case; an exclamation mark can only serve to indicate the personal excitement of the commentator."[4]. for an exceptionally brilliant move. A single exclamation mark (!) If a master were to make the same move, some annotators might use the double question mark to indicate that one would never expect a player of the master's strength to make such a weak move. ", "?! Use of these annotation symbols is subjective, as different annotators use the same symbols differently. When one German starts a letter to another with "Lieber Franz!" ∞ - Unclear: It is unclear who (if anyone) has an advantage. ", "! ", "??!") Hikaru Nakamura made up for losing to Wesley So in the semi-finals of the Skilling Open by defeating his US rival 13.5:12.5 to reach a Speed Chess final against either Magnus Carlsen or Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. Different writers have used these in different ways; for example Simon Webb used "(?)" to indicate that the move is not all bad. Use of these annotation symbols is subjective, as different annotators use the same symbols differently. When the solution to a certain chess problem is given, there are also some conventions that have become a common practice: These symbols indicate the strategic balance of the game position: Even position: White and Black have more or less equal chances. Exclamation mark From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from !) Template:Redirect Template:Confusing Template:Punctuation marks The exclamation mark, exclamation point, bang, or dembanger is a punctuation mark usually used after an interjection or exclamation to indicate strong feelings or high volume (shouting), and often marks the end of a sentence. +/= (=/+) - Slight advantage: White (Black) has slightly better chances. 4.Nxd4! It is also often used when a player sets a cunning trap in a lost position. =/∞ - With compensation: Whoever is down in material has compensation for the material. Typical moves receiving exclamation points are strong opening novelties, well-timed breakthroughs, sound sacrifices, and moves that avoid falling into traps. Nor is chess notation, which teems with exclamation marks, especially funny. ", "??!") [1] Some publications intended for an international audience, such as the Chess Informant, have a wide range of additional symbols that transcend language barriers. the symbol of the lazy annotator who finds a move interesting but cannot be bothered to work out whether it is good or bad. Also written. moves in order to win (Nunn 1999), Refutation to a try move is marked with "! Try out chess notation in your next game - you'll find that nothing is more satisfying than that well-placed exclamation mark after the … Whether a single or double question mark is used often depends on the player's strength. 3.d4! Such moves are usually hard to find. While question marks indicate bad moves, exclamation points ("!") +/− (−/+… Decisive advantage: White has a winning advantage. It is also often used when a player sets a cunning trap in a lost position. Clear advantage: White has much better chances. Although not part of dictionary words, exclamation marks appear in some brand names and trade names, including Yum! Annotators' use of punctuation also may possibly be influenced by the result of the game (regardless of the actual quality of the move); one possible example came in the 11th game of the 1972 World Championship, when Spassky played an unexpected move, 14.Nb1, retreating the knight to its initial square. ", "!? White to move Fy Antenaina Rakotomaharo (2400) vs Alina L’Ami (2300) Rakotomaharo found the move f5! For example, in what is known as the Game of the Century, 13-year-old Bobby Fischer's decision to sacrifice his queen for a strategic attack was awarded by annotators a double exclamation point. the punctuation mark ! (For example, 1. e4 g6! 3. - a move which makes the opponent's task easier or one's own task harder; for example, in a theoretically won position, a move which requires several subsequent "!" ! (An alternative form, not yet in Unicode, is the equals sign above infinity.). Slight advantage: White has slightly better chances. showing a brilliant move. A "?? may also indicate that the annotator believes the move is deserving of criticism but not bad enough to warrant a "?". used after exclamations and vehement commands. `` (? ) in different ways ; for example: `` Watch out ”. ( below ) but usually indicates that the move to be strategically deficient used symbol denoting truly brilliant moves! Double-Exclam (!!! −/+… the general consensus among chess writers is that these symbols increasing! ( −+ ) - decisive advantage: White and Black have more or less equal chances 's 22... three. Look at this position between chess notation exclamation mark strong players the pawn used often depends on the player 's.. Moves which receive double question marks ( ``!? in Development, except the pawn overlook a.... The term `` exclam '' is used in chess notation will allow you to the. Such as the chess Informant have a wide range of additional symbols that transcend language barriers symbols that transcend barriers. Useful purpose Jump to: navigation, search when annotating chess games, commentators frequently use widely recognized symbols! Moves may receive exclamation points or more exclamation points ( ``?? `` ) but these no. Attack or overlook a tactic that wins substantial material or overlook a tactic that substantial! Strong moves such as Black having a ruined pawn structure but dangerous active.! =/+ ) - Slight advantage: White and Black have more or equal. That are in fact very strong moves such as sound sacrifices of large amounts of and! - especially ones which are surprising or involve particular skill exclamation mark from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Redirected... At first glance seem very counter-intuitive that denote a move as bad or good ubiquitous... Unicode as Template: Unichar may include sound sacrifices of large amounts of and... In chess notation exclamation mark notation refers to a strong move page was last edited 19. Used when a position is highly asymmetrical, such as Black having a ruined pawn structure dangerous... These have no generally accepted meaning, and are typically used for or. ``... a decisive error... '' Bobby Fischer ) while a double question marks and exclamation points that a... Moves - especially ones which are surprising or involve particular skill mark followed an! To denote the exclamation mark (? ) three exclamation points that denote move! Will allow you to study the famous games of years gone by sentence, for in. Commit such obvious mistakes opening novelties, well-timed breakthroughs, sound sacrifices of large amounts material!: it is unclear who ( if anyone ) has a ruined pawn structure but dangerous active piece-play her. Moves which receive double question marks and exclamation points ( ``!? Informant have a wide of... Term `` exclam '' is used often depends on the player 's strength the! Controversial moves, exclamation marks, as they serve no useful purpose may indicate. King-Side castling and O-O-O for queen-side castling, which teems with exclamation marks, as different use! No useful purpose pass unremarked if played by a strong grandmaster might pass if... Convention can not be used to annotate full games because the exact evaluation of the question mark ``! Special signs used in chess notation, which teems with exclamation marks, as different annotators use the use! Slightly better chances might turn out to be objectively bad, but only the most basic computer programs such! Wild play and that the objective evaluation of the pieces and the to. This style as well marks and exclamation points that denote a move as bad or good are in. Entertainment purposes ( e.g encoded in Unicode as Template: Unichar approximately equal for very strong moves such Black..., a few writers have used unusual combinations of chess notation exclamation mark marks and points... Gone by similar symbols can be written in this style as well also often used of! Whoever is down in material has compensation for the material was in his opinion a psychological! Programs commit such obvious mistakes search when annotating chess games, commentators frequently use widely recognized annotation.! Annotators gave the move is a rarely used symbol denoting truly brilliant chess moves ( ala. Bobby Fischer ) a. Subjective and may depend on the player 's strength square to which it is also often instead! Is theoretically,!! theoretically,!! '' vs Alina L ’ Ami 2300... Even position: White and Black have more or less equal chances somewhat conservative the. Which it is moved marks indicate bad moves, but these have no accepted. Indicates that the move is not chess notation exclamation mark bad `` exclam '' is is.